Multiple qd-led sub-pixels for high on-axis brightness and low colour shift

ABSTRACT

A light emitting structure comprises a bank surrounding a sub-pixel stack on a substrate, a first filler material in an interior space above the sub-pixel stack, and a second filler material over the first filler material. The sub-pixel stack emits a first emission peak along an on-axis direction substantially normal to a top surface of the sub-pixel stack and through an interface between the first and second filler materials. The sub-pixel stack emits a second emission peak along an off-axis direction that is totally internally reflected by the interface before reaching a sloped sidewall of the bank and is then emitted along the on-axis direction. An emissive area of the sub-pixel stack is configured such that the second emission peak is reflected by the interface not more than once before reaching the sloped sidewall.

FIELD

The present disclosure generally relates to layers and bank structures used for emissive devices, in particular for Quantum Dot (QD) Light Emitting Diode (LED) displays. In particular, the present disclosure seeks to improve efficiency, reduce colour shift, and improve on-axis brightness for top emitting structures embedded in a high refractive index encapsulate material surrounded by a bank.

BACKGROUND

An Organic Light Emitting Diode (OLED) is among the most prevalent LEDs used in a display device while quantum dots are proposed as an improvement to OLEDs as they have better spectral emission and are chemically more stable. Quantum dots are often used as phosphors for blue LEDs and exist as backlight for Liquid Crystal Displays (LCDs). Conventional LED displays take a refining approach with cavities in the LED structure and their effect on light. For example, Kodak (US20060158098) describes a top emitting structure and Samsung (U.S. Pat. No. 9,583,727) describes an OLED and QLED structure with light emitting regions between reflective areas, one of which is partially transmitting.

Other displays involve methods to improve luminance of cavities in LEDs. For example, Samsung (US2015/0084012) describes the use of dispersive layers in an OLED structure, Samsung (U.S. Pat. No. 8,894,243) describes the use of microstructure scattering to improve efficiency, and 3M (WO2017/205174) describes enhancement of light emission by use of surface plasmon nanoparticles or nanostructures in transport layers.

Methods that involve modifications to a cavity (or cavities) are often difficult to implement as they require very small size features or control of layers. One alternative to modifying the cavity is to use a thick top “filler” layer with a high refractive index, which enables reduction in Fresnel reflections and increases in transmissivity through a top electrode. However, the light in a high index layer may be mostly trapped by total internal reflection (TIR). To extract the trapped light, reflective and/or scattering banks surrounding the filler layer are used to out-couple light that is trapped by TIR.

TCL (CN106876566) and JOLED (U.S. Pat. No. 9,029,843) describe such a pixel arrangement with banks and a filler material above the organic layers of the cavity and between the banks. Hitachi (U.S. Pat. No. 7,091,658) describes banks that can be reflective using electrode metallic material, Cambridge Display Tech (KR1020150020140) describes banks that can be shaped in different structures using different assembly steps, and Sharp (U.S. Ser. No. 10/090,489) describes a shaped reflector underneath the organic layers.

Another approach is to control filler materials. For example, Global OLED (U.S. Pat. No. 8,207,668) describes filler layers that can be controlled, where the fillers and organic layers have different thicknesses for different sub pixels, in order to maximize the light output as a function of wavelength.

In yet another approach, Lee et al. (“Three Dimensional Pixel Configurations for Optical Outcoupling of OLED Displays—Optical Simulation”, Proceedings SID Display Week 2019) describes simulations of pixel banks structures with the design of an OLED emission layer. Such approach simulates optimum extraction efficiencies with bank structures that maximize efficiency for real bank structures. The optimum solution involves only green light and an ITO electrode, which would not be practical in such a device as the emission spectrum would be too broad, and thus have an inferior colour gamut while On-axis brightness (apparent brightness to the user) is not considered.

In yet another approach, red, green, or blue pixels are split into multiple sub-pixels. Each sub-pixel is not independently controlled, and the sub-pixels emit equally according to the required emission at a specific pixel. For example, Japan Display (JP6274771) describes a display where the sub-pixels are split equally for both colours. Semiconductor Energy Laboratories (U.S. Pat. No. 8,587,742) describes such split arrangement offset by colours. Shenzhen Yunyinggu Technology Co., Ltd. (U.S. Ser. No. 10/103,205) describes an OLED display with two red and green sub-pixels and only one blue pixel.

In yet another approach, arrangements of sub-pixels can also be asymmetric between colours as described in Japan Display Inc. (U.S. Pat. No. 9,680,133). In another approach, the shapes of each pixels can also be irregular, for example, Japan Display Inc. (U.S. Pat. No. 9,337,242) describes red, green, blue and white pixels that are arranged in “stripes” across a rectangular pixel or BOE (U.S. Ser. No. 10/401,691) describes the pixels that are alternate parallelograms.

In yet another approach, sub-pixel structuring is more unusual, for example, BOE (US2017/0110519) describes different sub pixels having different cavity designs to reduce colour shift effects. In another approach, Lockheed Martin Corp. (US 2019/0103518) describes stacked emitting areas in a hexagonal shape to produce white light.

CITATION LIST

U.S. Pub. No. US 2006/0158098 A1 (Eastman Kodak Company, published Jul. 20, 2006).

U.S. Pat. No. 9,583,727 B2 (Samsung Display Co. Ltd., patented Feb. 28, 2017).

U.S. Pub. No. US 2015/0084012 A1 (Samsung Display Co. Ltd, published Mar. 26, 2015).

U.S. Pat. No. 8,894,243 B2 (Samsung Corning Precision Materials Co. Ltd., patented Nov. 25, 2014).

International Pub. No. WO2017/205174 A1 (3M Innovative Properties Company, published Nov. 30, 2017).

Chinese Pub. No. CN106876566 A (TCL, published Jun. 20, 2017).

U.S. Pat. No. 9,029,843 B2 (JOLED Inc., patented May 12, 2015).

U.S. Pat. No. 7,091,658 B2 (Hitachi, patented Aug. 15, 2006).

Korean No. KR1020150020140 (Cambridge Display Tech, published Feb. 25, 2015).

U.S. Pat. No. 10,090,489 B2 (Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha, patented Oct. 2, 2018).

U.S. Pat. No. 8,207,668 B2 (Global OLED Technology LLC, patented Jun. 26, 2012).

Lee et al. (“Three Dimensional Pixel Configurations for Optical Outcoupling of OLED Displays—Optical Simulation”, Proceedings SID Display Week 2019, published 2019).

Japan Pat. No. JP 6274771 (Japan Display Inc., patented Feb. 7, 2018).

U.S. Pat. No. 8,587,742 B2 (Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd., patented Nov. 19, 2013).

U.S. Pat. No. 10,103,205 B2 (Shenzhen Yunyinggu Technology Co., Ltd., patented Oct. 16, 2018).

U.S. Pat. No. 9,680,133 B2 (Japan Display Inc., patented Jun. 13, 2017).

U.S. Pat. No. 9,337,242 B2 (Japan Display Inc., patented May 10, 2016).

U.S. Pat. No. 10,401,691 B2 (BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd., patented Sep. 3, 2019).

U.S. Pub. No. US 2017/0110519 A1 (BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd., published Apr. 20, 2017).

U.S. Pub. No. US 2019/0103518 A1 (Lockheed Martin Corp., published Apr. 4, 2019).

SUMMARY

The present disclosure relates to multiple QD-LED sub-pixels for high on-axis brightness and low colour shift.

In accordance with one aspect of the present disclosure, a light emitting structure comprises a substrate, a sub-pixel stack over a surface of the substrate, a bank surrounding the sub-pixel stack and forming an interior space above the sub-pixel stack, a first filler material in the interior space and having a first refraction index, and a second filler material over the first filler material and having a second refractive index lower than the first refractive index, and an interface between the first filler material and the second filler material. The sub-pixel stack emits a first emission peak into the first filler material along an on-axis direction substantially normal to a top surface of the sub-pixel stack and emits a second emission peak into the first filler material along an off-axis direction at an angle to the on-axis direction, the first emission peak is emitted through the interface substantially without total internal reflection, the second emission peak is totally internally reflected by the interface before reaching a sloped sidewall of the bank, and the second emission peak is reflected by the sloped sidewall and emitted through the interface along the on-axis direction without substantial total internal reflection. An emissive area of the sub-pixel stack is configured such that the second emission peak is reflected by the interface not more than once before reaching the sloped sidewall of the bank.

In some implementations, a minimum width of the emissive area of the sub-pixel stack is configured based on a thickness of the first filler material, and the angle between the on-axis direction of the first emission peak and the off-axis direction of the second emission peak.

In some implementations, the first emission peak is emitted through the interface along the on-axis direction in a central region of the light emitting structure, the second emission peak reflected by the sloped sidewall of the bank is emitted through the interface along the on-axis direction in a peripheral region of the light emitting structure, and on-axis brightness is increased and off-axis colour shift having an angle is reduced.

In some implementations, the first emission peak is emitted through the interface along the on-axis direction in a peripheral region of the light emitting structure adjacent to a bottom edge of the bank, the second emission peak reflected by the sloped sidewall of the bank is emitted through the interface along the on-axis direction in another peripheral region of the light emitting structure opposite of the peripheral region, and on-axis brightness is increased and off-axis colour shift having an angle is reduced.

In some implementations, the light emitting structure further comprises another sub-pixel stack arranged immediately adjacent to the sub-pixel stack, and the another sub-pixel stack emits the first emission peak and the second emission peak and has an emissive area substantially equal to the emission area of the sub-pixel stack.

In some implementations, the sub-pixel stack and the another sub-pixel stack are controlled to a same control signal.

In some implementations, the second filler material has a second refractive index substantially equal to or lower than a first refractive index of the first filler material.

In some implementations, the emissive area has one of the following shapes, a rectangular shape, a square shape, an elliptical shape, a circular shape, and a triangular shape.

In some implementations, an angle between the sloped sidewall of the bank and the top surface of the sub-pixel stack is one-half the angle between the on-axis direction of the first emission peak and the off-axis direction of the second emission peak.

In some implementations, the sub-pixel stack comprises an emissive layer between a first transport layer and a second transport layer, a first electrode layer coupled to the first transport layer; and a second electrode layer coupled to the second transport layer.

In some implementations, the emissive layer includes quantum dot emission material, the first transport layer includes a hole transport layer, the second transport layer includes an electron transport layer, the first electrode layer is an anode layer including a metallic reflector for reflecting the light emitted from the emissive layer, and the second electrode layer is a cathode layer including a non-metallic and substantially transparent material.

In some implementations, the emissive layer includes quantum dot emission material, the first transport layer includes an electron transport layer, the second transport layer includes a hole transport layer, the first electrode layer is a cathode layer having a metallic reflector for reflecting the light emitted from the emissive layer, and the second electrode layer is an anode layer having a non-metallic and substantially transparent material.

In accordance with another aspect of the present disclosure, a display device comprises a light emitting structure. The light emitting structure comprises a substrate, a sub-pixel stack over a surface of the substrate, a bank surrounding the sub-pixel stack and forming an interior space above the sub-pixel stack, a first filler material in the interior space and having a first refraction index, and a second filler material over the first filler material and having a second refractive index lower than the first refractive index, and an interface between the first filler material and the second filler material. The sub-pixel stack emits a first emission peak into the first filler material along an on-axis direction substantially normal to a top surface of the sub-pixel stack and emits a second emission peak into the first filler material along an off-axis direction at an angle to the on-axis direction, the first emission peak is emitted through the interface substantially without total internal reflection, the second emission peak is totally internally reflected by the interface before reaching a sloped sidewall of the bank, and the second emission peak is reflected by the sloped sidewall and emitted through the interface along the on-axis direction without substantial total internal reflection. An emissive area of the sub-pixel stack is configured such that the second emission peak is reflected by the interface not more than once before reaching the sloped sidewall of the bank.

In accordance with another aspect of the present disclosure, a light emitting structure comprises a substrate, a plurality of sub-pixel structures over the substrate, each of the plurality of sub-pixel structures having a same emissive area. At least one of the plurality of sub-pixel structures includes a sub-pixel stack over the substrate, a bank surrounding the sub-pixel stack on the substrate and forming a cavity above the sub-pixel stack, a first filler material in the cavity, and a second filler material over the first filler material, the second filler material having a second refractive index substantially equal to or lower than a first refractive index of the first filler material. The sub-pixel stack emits a first emission peak along an on-axis direction substantially normal to a top surface of the sub-pixel stack, and a second emission peak along an off-axis direction at an angle to the on-axis direction, the first emission peak emits through an interface between the first filler material and the second filler material substantially without reflection, the second emission peak from the sub-pixel stack is totally reflected by the interface onto a sloped sidewall of the bank, and the second emission peak reflected from the sloped sidewall of the bank emits along the on-axis direction through the interface substantially without reflection, and the second emission peak is reflected by the interface not more than once before reaching the sloped sidewall of the bank.

In some implementations, a minimum width of the emissive area is configured based on a thickness of the first filler material, and the angle between the on-axis direction of the first emission peak and the off-axis direction of the second emission peak.

In some implementations, an angle between the sloped sidewall of the bank and the top surface of the sub-pixel stack is one-half the angle between the on-axis direction of the first emission peak and the off-axis direction of the second emission peak.

In some implementations, the emissive areas of the plurality of sub-pixel structures are substantially the same, and have one of the following shapes, a rectangular shape, a square shape, an elliptical shape, a circular shape, and a triangular shape.

In some implementations, the sub-pixel stack comprises an emissive layer between a first transport layer and a second transport layer, a first electrode layer coupled to the first transport layer; and a second electrode layer coupled to the second transport layer.

In some implementations, the emissive layer includes quantum dot emission material, the first transport layer includes a hole transport layer, the second transport layer includes an electron transport layer, the first electrode layer is an anode layer including a metallic reflector for reflecting the light emitted from the emissive layer, and the second electrode layer is a cathode layer including a non-metallic and substantially transparent material.

In some implementations, the emissive layer includes quantum dot emission material, the first transport layer includes an electron transport layer, the second transport layer includes a hole transport layer, the first electrode layer is a cathode layer having a metallic reflector for reflecting the light emitted from the emissive layer, and the second electrode layer is an anode layer having a non-metallic and substantially transparent material.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

Aspects of the example disclosure are best understood from the following detailed description when read with the accompanying figures. Various features are not drawn to scale. Dimensions of various features may be arbitrarily increased or reduced for clarity of discussion.

FIG. 1A is a schematic cross-sectional view of a portion of an example light emitting structure in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure.

FIG. 1B is a schematic cross-sectional view of a portion of the sub-pixel stack in the light emitting structure of FIG. 1A in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure.

FIG. 2A illustrates a portion of an example light emitting structure in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure.

FIG. 2B illustrates an example angular distribution diagram of a single emission peak at one wavelength as measured in the example light emitting structure of FIG. 2A in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure.

FIG. 2C illustrates a portion of another example light emitting structure in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure.

FIG. 2D illustrates example angular distributions of three emission peaks measured in the example light emitting structure of FIG. 2C in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure.

FIG. 3 illustrates example angular distribution diagrams from a light emitting structure in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure.

FIG. 4A is a schematic cross-sectional view of an example light emitting structure in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure.

FIG. 4B, FIG. 4C, and FIG. 4D are detailed schematic cross-sectional views of three example structures of three sub-pixel stacks in the light emitting structure of FIG. 4A in accordance with example implementations of the present disclosure.

FIG. 5 is a schematic cross-sectional view of an example light emitting structure in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure.

FIG. 6 is a schematic cross-sectional view of another example light emitting structure in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure.

FIG. 7A is a schematic cross-sectional view of another example light emitting structure in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure.

FIG. 7B is a schematic cross-sectional view of another example light emitting structure in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure.

FIG. 8A is a schematic perspective view of another example light emitting structure in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure.

FIG. 8B is a schematic top view of the example light emitting structure of FIG. 8A in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure.

FIG. 9A is a schematic top view of another example light emitting structure in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure.

FIG. 9B is a schematic cross-sectional view of the example light emitting structure of FIG. 9A along the line A-A′ in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure.

FIG. 10 is a schematic top plan view of another example light emitting structure in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure.

FIG. 11 is a schematic top view of another example light emitting structure in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure.

FIG. 12 is a schematic top plan view of another example light emitting structure in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure.

FIG. 13 is a schematic top plan view of another example light emitting structure in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure.

DESCRIPTION

The following disclosure contains specific information pertaining to example implementations in the present disclosure. The drawings in the present disclosure and their accompanying detailed description are directed to merely example implementations. However, the present disclosure is not limited to merely these example implementations. Other variations and implementations of the present disclosure will occur to those skilled in the art.

Unless noted otherwise, like or corresponding elements among the figures may be indicated by like or corresponding reference numerals. Moreover, the drawings and illustrations in the present disclosure are generally not to scale, and are not intended to correspond to actual relative dimensions.

For the purposes of consistency and ease of understanding, like features may be identified (although, in some examples, not shown) by the same numerals in the example figures. However, the features in different implementations may be differed in other respects, and thus shall not be narrowly confined to what is shown in the figures.

The description uses the phrases “in one implementation,” or “in some implementations,” which may each refer to one or more of the same or different implementations. The term “comprising” means “including, but not necessarily limited to” and specifically indicates open-ended inclusion or membership in the so-described combination, group, series and the equivalent. The expression “at least one of A, B and C” or “at least one of the following: A, B and C” means “only A, or only B, or only C, or any combination of A, B and C.”

Additionally, for the purposes of explanation and non-limitation, specific details, such as functional entities, techniques, protocols, standard, and the like are set forth for providing an understanding of the described technology. In other examples, detailed description of well-known methods, technologies, systems, architectures, and the like are omitted so as not to obscure the description with unnecessary details.

The present disclosure relates to an emissive display involving a quantum dot electro-emissive material in a light emitting diode (LED) arrangement. The LED arrangement typically includes a layer of quantum dot (QD) emission material (e.g., emissive layer) sandwiched between an electron transport layer (ETL) and a hole transport layer (HTL). The three layers are sandwiched between two conductive layers to form a sub-pixel stack. In one or more implementations of the present disclosure, a “top” emitting (TE) structure is used. The TE structure involves light emission from a side of the TE structure opposite a glass substrate on which the TE structure is disposed.

In one or more implementations of the present disclosure, fabrication of a TE device involves one thick layer of conductive reflective material, typically, made of a metal (e.g., silver or aluminium) deposited on the glass substrate with the HTL layer on the conductive reflective layer (e.g., a reflective conductor or reflective electrode), the emissive layer on the HTL layer, the ETL layer on the emissive layer, and a transparent electrode layer on the ETL layer. In one preferred implementation, the reflective electrode has a thickness greater than 80 nm (i.e., 10{circumflex over ( )}-9 meters). In another preferred implementation, the reflective electrode includes a layer of silver having a thickness of approximately 100 nm and a layer of Indium Tin Oxide (ITO) having a thickness of approximately 10 nm. In one preferred implementation, the HTL layer is made of a layer of PEDOT:PSS (poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate) approximately 40 nm thick and a layer of TFB (poly(9,9′-dioctylfluorene-co-bis-N,N′-(4-butylphenyl)diphenylamine)) having a thickness of approximately 35-45 nm on the PEDOT:PSS layer. In another preferred implementation, an approximately 20 nm thick emissive layer is disposed on the HTL layer and the ETL layer is disposed on the emissive layer. In another preferred implementation, the ETL layer is made of Zinc Oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles and has a thickness of approximately 30-80 nm. In one preferred implementation, the transparent electrode layer is a thin metal layer thick enough to carry sufficient current yet thin enough to be transparent to light and disposed on the ETL layer. In one preferred implementation, the transparent electrode layer is an ITO layer having a thickness of approximately 80 nm.

In one or more implementations of the present disclosure, angular emission distributions from the emissive layer can be determined by a distance between the emissive layer and the reflective electrode layer (e.g., at the bottom of the sub-pixel stack) and the distance is directly dependent on a total thickness of the HTL layer. The distance between the emissive layer and the reflective electrode layer may be tuned such that there are two directions of light emissions from the light source where constructive interference occurs. One direction is an on-axis emission (e.g., emission normal to a plane, or a top surface, of the sub-pixel stack) and the other direction is an off-axis emission (e.g., emission is at an angle with respect to the on-axis direction).

In an example implementation where the reflective electrode is a perfect mirror, the reflective electrode layer is at a distance of a wavelength (e.g., λ) apart from the emissive layer. The distance may be 0.5, 1, or any integer with a multiple of 0.5 wavelength apart from the emissive layer. In an example implementation where the reflective electrode is not a perfect mirror (e.g., in other words a phase shift exists), a point of reflection will not be located exactly at the surface of the reflective electrode. In one or more implementations of the present disclosure, the reflective electrode is, for example, at a distance of about 1 wavelength apart from the emissive layer in order generate two emissions (e.g., on-axis and off-axis emissions). However, in order to offset the effects of the phase shift in the reflective electrode, the distance is adjusted to 0.87 wavelength. The emissive layer may generate a constructive on-axis emission normal to the reflective electrode and an off-axis emission at approximately 50° off-axis with respect to the on-axis emission such that a thickness of the HTL layer may be obtained.

The correlation described previously between the distance, thickness, angular emissions, and wavelength may be represented by the following equations:

2(d−d′)cos(θ_(P))=N*λ  Equation (1)

d=T  Equation (2)

where d is a sum of all optical thicknesses of all layers (e.g., 104 d 1 and 104 d 2 in FIG. 1B) in the HTL layer, d′ is an optical distance from a top surface of the reflective electrode to an interior portion of the reflective electrode where effective reflection takes place (e.g., d′ in FIG. 1B), θ_(P) is an angle between the on-axis emission and the off-axis emission (e.g., FIG. 1A), N is an integer greater than zero, λ is wavelength in free space, and T is a total thickness of the HTL layer which may include one or more layers (e.g., TFB layer and PEDOT:PSS layer) with each layer having a different refractive index. With Equations (1) and (2), the thickness T can be tuned accordingly. In an example implementation, N may equal to 1 to give a broad forward emission direction. In a preferred example implementation, N may equal to 2 if d is predetermined and θ_(P) equals to 0 (e.g., d−d′=λ). As such, if cos(θ_(P)) equals to ½ (e.g., θ_(P) is 60°), a second peak may be generated. Due to the difference in refractive indices between various elements (e.g., HTL layer, filler layer, etc.) of the present disclosure, θ_(P) is less than 60° in one preferred implementation, and θ_(P) is about 50°-55° in yet another preferred implementation). The term “emission” described in the present disclosure may refer to a distribution of wavelengths emitted, but is not limited to a single wavelength. The term “wavelength” in the present disclosure may be used to describe a peak or central wavelength amongst the plurality of wavelengths in the context of equations above, but is not limited to the description provided herein.

The present disclosure is not limited to the provided examples as the essential principle of the disclosed structure still applies if the arrangement of the ETL and HTL layers are reversed. In a preferred implementation of the present disclosure, the thickness of whichever transport layer is between the emitting layer and the base (opaque) reflector on the substrate.

The example implementations of the present disclosure may be related to QLED structures. However, the present disclosure is not limited only to QLED structures and may be applicable to various implementations related to OLED structures.

In QLED sub-pixels, an interior space structure (e.g., a cavity structure) may be outlined by a sub-pixel stack and a bank structure surrounding the sub-pixel stack. A filler material with higher refractive index may be disposed in the interior space structure above the sub-pixel stack. The bank structure may have a height that is, at least, the same as or higher than the filler material with high refractive index. The bank structure may also be lower in height with respect to the filler material in some implementations. The filler material with higher refractive index may extract more light from the interior space than a layer directly above the filler material with low refractive index. The low refractive index layer is disposed over the filler material to prevent optical crosstalk by preventing light from being coupled to the neighbouring pixels by an upper glass layer disposed above the low refractive index layer. The low refractive index layer traps light in the filler material that is more readily absorbed. Therefore, light can be extracted more effectively from the filler material without coupling light into the upper glass layer. In one or more implementations, the low refractive index layer may be at least one of an air gap, siloxane based nano-composite polymers from Inkron with refractive index as low as 1.15, Poly(1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoroisopropyl acrylate) with a refractive index of 1.375, and Poly(2,2,3,3,4,4,4-heptafluorobutyl acrylate) with a refractive index of 1.377.

In the present disclosure, with the interior space structure and the top transparent electrode, a distance between the emissive layer and the reflective electrode is tuned as described previously such that there are on-axis emissions and off-axis emissions. The off-axis emissions will be reflected onto the top surface (e.g., an interface) of the filler material via total internal reflection (TIR) at least once before being reflected off a sloped-surface of the bank and emitted through the filler material along the on-axis direction. The bank structure at ends of each pixel is designed such that a sloped angle of the bank structure (e.g., bank angle) is one-half an angle of an off-axis emission into the filler material relative to the on-axis emission.

In the present disclosure, light emitted from the cavity structure in the direction to be reflected will then propagate to the bank by reflection from the filler surface and the original cavity. In general, as the incident direction of light from the filler top surface is the same as the emission, the absorption in the cavity will be higher than at other angles. Thus, absorption and weakening of the propagated light has consequences, such as a reduced efficiency and collimation, a reduced mixing of on-axis and off-axis light emission and thus poorer colour shift off-axis, and a weak tolerance to the size of the sub-pixel and colour matching.

In the present disclosure, the efficiency, peak brightness, and colour shift of an emissive display may be affected by the number of times an off-axis emission emitted from the an emissive area (e.g., a top surface area) of sub-pixel stack are reflected within the cavity (e.g., incident upon the filler material immediately above the sub-pixel stack) before reaching the bank since the propagated light is absorbed during propagation through the filler material.

In various implementations of the present disclosure, the size of the emissive area of a sub-pixel is configured such that light emission from the centre of the sub-pixel in at least one direction from the off-axis peak does not impact the cavity before reaching the bank. Also, any emission anywhere on the sub-pixel, the off-axis emission impacts not more than once on the cavity.

In various implementations of the present disclosure, the bank and emission size have an optimum size beyond which the efficiency and collimation significantly reduces, and the colour shift changes. Thus, for a given resolution of the panel, more than one sub-pixel is needed in one independently controllable emission area. Each sub-pixel is not independently controllable with respect to their emission. In various implementations of the present disclosure, preferred shapes for sub-pixels, whereby the efficiency is maximised, colour shift is minimised and the tolerance on pixel size is maximised, are described and shown.

In various implementations of the present disclosure, emissions may be in all directions (to maximise brightness for a smartphone, for example), or in only one direction (for example for a TV, where a broad emission in only one direction is required).

In the present disclosure, the size of the emissive area may be configured such that the number of times that the off-axis emission reflected within the filler material to be not more than once before reaching the bank to improve efficiency, peak brightness, colour shift values, and significantly improves tolerance to the pixel size of the values above.

In the present disclosure, the size of the emissive area may be configured by a minimum sub-pixel emission width of a pixel, which is determined by a thickness of the filler material immediately above the sub-pixel stack, and an angle between the on-axis emission and the off-axis emission. In the present disclosure, the filler material may have a thickness from 1.5 μm to 5 μm, and an angle (e.g., depending on refractive index of the filler material) between 50° and 60°, while the bank may have an angle from the horizontal of around 20-30°. In the present disclosure, a preferable minimum sub-pixel emission width may be less than 13.3 μm, which is independent of colour and refractive index of the filler material, and the thickness may be preferable 2.5 μm and the angle may preferably be 53°.

With a white RGB pixel where the colour sub pixels have a pitch of 13.3 μm in one direction (e.g., x-axis), an example emissive display would indicate a resolution more than 1900 colour dots per inch (dpi), taking the width of a bank between pixels into account, in such direction. Such an arrangement may have a very high resolution and lower resolutions may be desirable where cost is important. With a plurality of sub-pixel stacks being controlled by the same control signal to replace a single white pixel in the example emissive display, for example, three sets of four adjacent sub-pixels stacks arranged in an array and controlled under the same control signal (e.g., FIG. 8A), the example emissive display would give a lower resolution.

According to the present disclosure, on-axis brightness is maximized as well as the brightness perceived by the user even if total light output efficiency is not maximized Since light of the on-axis emission is generally perceived by a user at a central area of a pixel and light of the off-axis emission is generally perceived at edges of a bank, a distribution of light from these different spectral areas may provide a more balanced colour distribution at all angles, thereby minimising colour shift at various angles.

FIG. 1A is a schematic cross-sectional view of a portion of an example light emitting structure in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure. In FIG. 1A, an example structure 100 may include a substrate 102, a sub-pixel stack 104, a bank 106, a first filler material 110, a second filler material 112, and a glass cover 122. In one or more implementations of the present disclosure, the first filler material 110 may be a higher refractive index material, and the second filler material 112 may be a lower refractive index material relative to the first filler material 110. The sub-pixel stack 104 may be disposed on the substrate 102 with the bank 106 surrounding the sub-pixel stack 104 to form an interior space 108 above the sub-pixel stack 104. In one implementation, the example structure 100 may include a pixel structure.

In the present implementation as shown in FIG. 1A, the first filler material 110 may be disposed in the interior space 108 that is formed by the bank 106 surrounding the sub-pixel stack 104. The second filler material 112 may be disposed continuously over the first filler material 110 and the bank 106.

In another implementation, the second filler material 112 may be partially disposed on the first filler material 110. In one or more implementations, the bank 106 may be greater in thickness than the thickness of the first filler material 110. In one or more implementations, the bank 106 is in contact with the substrate 102. In a preferred implementation, the bank 106 may be in contact or almost in contact with the second filler material 112. In one or more implementations, the glass cover 122 may be disposed continuously over the second filler material 112.

In one or more implementations, light is emitted from the sub-pixel stack 104 through the first filler material 110, the second filler material 112, and the glass cover 122. The first filler material 110 may have a higher refractive index than air so that the first filler material 110 may extract light from the sub-pixel stack 104 to a greater extent than air as a filler material. Light trapped in the sub-pixel stack 104 may be quickly absorbed while light trapped in the first filler material 110 may propagate to edges of the bank 106 and be extracted by reflection.

In one or more implementations, the first filler material 110 may have a higher refractive index than those of the sub-pixel stack 104 and the second filler material 112. In one implementation, the second filler material 112 (e.g., a lower refractive index layer) may be an air gap. In one or more implementations, the bank 106 may be opaque. A surface of the bank 106 facing the first filler materials 110 may be scattering reflective or specular reflective, and may be at an angle (e.g., sloped) with respect to the plane of the substrate 102 (e.g. a glass substrate).

FIG. 1B is a schematic cross-sectional view of a portion of the sub-pixel stack in the light emitting structure of FIG. 1A in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure. As shown in FIG. 1B, the sub-pixel stack 104 includes a first electrode layer 104 a, an ETL layer 104 b, an emissive layer 104 c, an HTL layer 104 d, and a second electrode layer 104 e.

In one example implementation, with reference to FIGS. 1A and 1B, the first filler material 110 may be disposed on the first electrode layer 104 a of the sub-pixel stack 104 and the refractive index of the first electrode layer 104 a may be substantially the same as the refractive index of the first filler material 110. In the present implementation, the first electrode layer 104 a may be a transparent top electrode and the second electrode layer 104 e may be a bottom reflective electrode. The first electrode layer 104 a may be a cathode layer that is non-metallic, substantially transparent, and disposed on the ETL layer 104 b. The second electrode layer 104 e may be disposed on the substrate 102 and may be an anode layer that is a metallic reflector reflecting light emitted from the emissive layer 104 c.

However, the arrangement of the first electrode layer 104 a and the second electrode layer 104 e is not limited to the examples provided herein and may be reversed. For example, the first electrode layer 104 a may be a bottom anode layer that is a metallic reflector reflecting light emitted from the emissive layer 104 c and the second electrode layer 104 e may be a top cathode layer that is non-metallic and substantially transparent.

As shown in FIG. 1B, the HTL layer 104 d may include a TFB layer 104 d 1 and a PEDOT:PSS layer 104 d 2. In another implementation, the HTL layer 104 d may include other layers and is not limited to the example layers provided herein. For example, a third layer may exist in the HTL layer 104 d between the bottom reflector and the PEDOT:PSS layer 104 d 2. The third layer may be of Indium Tin Oxide (ITO) or Indium Zinc Oxide (IZO). In another implementation, the previous arrangements of the HTL layer 104 d and the ETL layer 104 b may be reversed depending on the arrangements of the first electrode layer 104 a and second electrode layer 104 e.

In one or more implementations of the present disclosure, with reference to FIGS. 1A and 1B, at least one single emission peak is produced from the sub-pixel stack 104. With reference to FIG. 1A, a main portion 114 of the emission peak (hereinafter a first emission peak 114) and other portions 116 of the emission peak (hereinafter a second emission peak 116) may be produced from the sub-pixel stack 104. The first emission peak 114 may be an on-axis emission that is emitted from the emissive layer 104 c, normal to a top surface of the emissive layer 104 c, through the ETL layer 104 b, the first electrode layer 104 a, and then through the first filler material 110, the second filler material 112, and the glass cover 122 substantially without total internal reflection.

In one or more implementations of the present disclosure, the second emission peak 116 may be an off-axis emission emitted from the emissive layer 104 c and into the first filler material 110 at an off-angle with respect to the first emission peak 114. The off-axis second emission peak 116 may reflect totally and internally at the interface 120 (e.g., the top surface of the first filler material 110) at least once as a total internal reflection (TIR) 118, before reaching a sloped sidewall 107 of the bank 106. The off-axis second emission peak 116 undergone total internal reflection may reflect off the sloped sidewall 107 along the on-axis direction (e.g., at an angle that is normal to the top surface of the emissive layer 104 c) and through the interface 120 substantially without total internal reflection.

In one or more implementations, the first emission peak 114 may be emitted through the interface 120 substantially without total internal reflection. In a preferred implementation, a bank angle θ_(B) of the sloped sidewall 107 is one-half an off-axis second emission peak angle θ_(P) with respect to the on-axis first emission peak 114. With this arrangement, a high on-axis brightness is achieved.

FIG. 2A illustrates a portion of an example light emitting structure in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure. FIG. 2B illustrates an example emission distribution diagram of the light emitting structure in FIG. 2A in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure.

In FIG. 2A, an example structure 200A may include a sub-pixel stack 204 which emits a plurality of light emissions including at least one single main emission peak, a first filler material 210, a second filler material 212, an interface 220, and a glass cover 222. In one or more implementations, the sub-pixel stack 204, the first filler material 210, the second filler material 212, the interface 220, and the glass cover 222 may correspond to the sub-pixel stack 104, the first filler material 110, the second filler material 112, the interface 120, and the glass cover 122, respectively, of the example structure 100 in FIG. 1A.

In FIG. 2A, the example structure 200A has a first electrode layer that may include a transparent top electrode layer, a second electrode layer that may be a reflective bottom electrode layer, and the interface 220 (e.g., a surface of the first filler material 210). As described above, a single main emission peak is produced by the emissive layer. A main portion 214 of the main emission peak (e.g., the straight arrow in FIG. 2A) passes through the first filler material 210 and second filler material 212 while the other portions of the main emission peak (e.g., other arrows not labelled in FIG. 2A) spread in various angles which leads to lower on-axis brightness.

As described above, the main portion 214 of the main emission peak (e.g., the on-axis emission) is emitted through the filler materials 210, 212 while the other portions of the emission peak (e.g., the off-axis emission) are spread in various angles. The on-axis first emission peak 214 is emitted normal to a top surface of the sub-pixel stack 204 while the off-axis emissions (e.g., other arrows not labelled in FIG. 2A) are emitted into the first filler material 210 at an off-angle with respect to the on-axis emission. In the present implementation, the on-axis emission is a first emission peak 214.

With reference to an example diagram 200B in FIG. 2B, angular distribution of the main emission peak at one wavelength is measured in the first filler material 210 of the example structure 200A in FIG. 2A. The on-axis first emission peak 214 and the off-axis emissions of the main emission peak are illustrated in the angular distribution.

FIG. 2C illustrates a portion of another example light emitting structure in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure. FIG. 2D illustrates angular distributions of three emission peaks measured in the first filler material 210 of the example structure 200C in FIG. 2C in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure.

In FIG. 2C, the example structure 200C may include a similar structure to that of the example structure 200A in FIG. 2A, Therefore, the details of the example structure 200C are omitted for brevity.

In contrast to the example structure 200A, the interface 220 (e.g., a top surface of the first filler material 210) in the example structure 200C has a higher refractive index. In the example structure 200C, the on-axis first emission peak 214 (e.g., the solid arrow) is emitted from the emissive layer of the sub-pixel stack 204 while the off-axis emissions of the main emission peak (hereinafter second emission peak 216, e.g., the other solid arrow) is emitted from the sub-pixel stack 204 and is totally reflected internally at least once against the interface 220 via total internal reflection 218 before being reflected off a sloped sidewall 207 at an angle that is normal to the top surface of the sub-pixel stack 204. In one or more implementations of the interface 220 (e.g., a surface of the high refractive index first filler material 210), the second emission peaks 216 may be totally reflected internally against the interface 220 at least once via total internal reflection 218 before being reflected off the sloped sidewall 207 at the normal angle.

With such arrangement, higher on-axis brightness is achieved. In contrast, without the interface 220 (e.g., a surface of the first filler material 210 not having high refractive index), the off-axis emissions (e.g., the dotted line arrow in the example structure 200C) may not be totally reflected internally to the bank but rather may be refracted off the first filler material 210, the second filler material 212, and the glass cover 222, which may result in a reduced on-axis brightness.

With reference to an example diagram 200D in FIG. 2D, angular distributions of three emission peaks are measured in the first filler material 210 of the example diagram 200D in FIG. 2D. The example diagram 200D illustrates the on-axis first emission peak 214 and the off-axis emissions that underwent TIR thus resulting in being two second emission peaks 216 planking the on-axis first emission peak 214.

FIG. 3 illustrates example diagrams 300A, 300B, and 300C of angular distribution from a light emitting structure in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure. It should be noted that the example diagrams 300A, 300B, and 300C described in FIG. 3 may substantially correspond to the example diagrams 200B and 200D described in FIG. 2. Therefore, the details of the example diagrams 300A, 300B, and 300C are omitted for brevity.

There are bound to be constructive interferences between the light emission peaks. These interferences are wavelength dependent and materials are generally dispersive in their nature towards the propagation of light. Light emissions from the emissive layers follow a finite spectra width in a calculation related to maximising efficiency and on-axis brightness. A high variability of a white point is seen as a function of polar angle. In one or more implementations of the present disclosure, the light emitting structure maximises on-axis brightness and minimises colour shift.

In FIG. 3, the example diagram 300A illustrates a real emission spectrum typically having a single central peak (or a primary peak if there are a plurality of peaks). A distance between the emitting layer and the bottom electrode layer is chosen so that the relative intensity of the on-axis and off-axis emissions (e.g., the first emission peak 314 and the second emission peaks 316 in the diagram 300B or 300C) into a filler material (e.g., the high refractive index first filler material) can be controlled.

The example diagrams 300B and 300C in FIG. 3 illustrate that light emitted from a sub-pixel stack has a plurality of wavelengths in which there is a central wavelength. In an example implementation, most of the light emission wavelengths that are emitted by the sub-pixel stack are shorter (e.g., 316 in the example diagram 300B) than the central wavelength (e.g., 314 in the example diagram 300B) while the central wavelength (or the on-axis emission) is spectrally more intense than the shorter wavelengths (or the off-axis emission). In another example implementation, most of the light emission wavelengths emitted by the sub-pixel stack are longer (e.g., 316 in the example diagram 300C) than the central wavelength (e.g., 314 in the example diagram 300C) and the central wavelength (or the on-axis emission) is spectrally less intense than the shorter wavelengths (or the off-axis emission). Since light emissions from the on-axis emission come from a bulk area of a pixel while light from the off-axis emission appears to come from edges of the pixel, light emission may balance out to achieve a low colour shift at various angles although each emission may have different spectra.

FIG. 4A is a schematic cross-sectional view of an example structure 400A of a light emitting structure in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure. The example structure 400A in FIG. 4A includes a glass substrate 402, a sub-pixel stack 404, a bank 406, a first filler material 410, a second filler material 412, and a glass cover 422. The example structure 400A may substantially correspond to the example structure 100 described in FIG. 1A. Therefore, the details of the example structure 400A are omitted for brevity.

In FIG. 4A, the example structure 400A differs from the example structure 100 in FIG. 1A since the example structure 400A includes three light emitting structures 400B, 400C, and 400D (e.g., three sub-pixel stacks) for three different pixels. In one or more implementations of the present disclosure, the example structure 400A may include the example structure 400B for a blue pixel, the example structure 400C for a green pixel, and the example structure 400D for a red pixel. In another implementation, the example structure 400A may include more than three example structures for more than three pixels, and is not limited to the described example.

In one or more implementations, a first emission peak 414 is emitted in the on-axis direction through both the first filler material 410 and the second filler material 412 substantially without total internal reflection 418. A second emission peak 416 is emitted from the sub-pixel stack 404 at an off-axis direction towards an interface 420 (e.g., a top surface of the first filler material 410) between the first filler material 410 and the second filler material 412 and is totally internally reflected (e.g., 418) by the interface 420 at least once before being reflected from a sloped sidewall 407 of the bank 406 along the on-axis direction substantially without total internal reflection 418.

FIGS. 4B, 4C, and 4D are detailed schematic cross-sectional views of three example structures 400B, 400C, and 400D (e.g., three dotted circles) of three sub-pixel stacks in the light emitting structure of FIG. 4A in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure. The example structures 400B-400D are example sub-pixel stacks 404 each including a first electrode layer 404 a, an ETL layer 404 b, an emissive layer 404 c, a HTL layer 404 d including a TFB layer 404 d 1 and a PEDOT:PSS layer 404 d 2, and a second electrode layer 404 e. The example structures 400B-400D may substantially correspond to the example structure 100 described in FIG. 1B. Therefore, the details of the example structures 400B, 400C, and 400D are omitted for brevity.

The three example structures 400B-400D are sub-pixel stacks 404 for three colour pixels (e.g., blue, green, and red pixels respectively). The distance between an emissive layer and a reflective electrode at the bottom of the emitting structure, or a thickness of the HTL layer, may be tuned such that the constructive on-axis first emission peaks 414 and the off-axis second emission peaks 416 are emitted.

In one or more implementations, the TFB layers 404 d 1 of the three example sub-pixel stacks 400B-400D have different thicknesses such that tuning the thickness t (e.g., t_(B), t_(G), and t_(R)) of each of the TFB layers 404 d 1 may alter the relative intensities of the first emission peak 414 and the second emission peak 416 in each of the example sub-pixel stacks 400B-400D. Therefore, the overall brightness is adjusted, and colour shift is reduced.

In one example implementation, the thickness t_(B) of the TFB layer 104 d 1 in the example structure 400B for the blue pixel (emitting a central wavelength at about 435 nm) is about 75 nm, the thickness t_(G) of the TFB layer 104 d 1 in the example structure 400C for the green pixel (emitting a central wavelength at about 530 nm) is about 115 nm, and the thickness t_(R) of the TFB layer 104 d 1 in the example structure 400D for the red pixel (emitting a central wavelength at about 620 nm) is about 150 nm. In a preferred implementation, the thickness or the distance between the emissive layer and the reflective electrode is 0.53 of a wavelength for each of the blue, green, and red pixels when refractive index is considered. The offset between the distances of the preferred implementation (where distance is 0.53) and an ideal implementation (where distance is 0.78) results from the reflective electrodes used. In the example implementation, the example structures 400B, 400C, and 400D respectively shown in FIGS. 4B, 4C, and 4D vary in thickness in only one of the layers (e.g., the TFB layer 404 d 1) of the HTL layer 404 d. However, in one or more implementations of the present disclosure, any or all layers of the HTL layer 404 d may vary in thickness such that a total optical thickness is the same as the total optical thickness if only one of the HTL layer 404 d changes in thickness.

FIG. 5 is a schematic cross-sectional view of an example structure 500 of a light emitting structure in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure. The example structure 500 includes a glass substrate 502, a sub-pixel stack 504, a bank 506, a first filler material 510, a second filler material 512, and a glass cover 522. The example structure 500 may substantially correspond to the example structure 100 described in FIG. 1A. Therefore, the details of the example structure 500 are omitted for brevity.

In one or more implementations, the example structure 500 differs from the example structure 100 in FIG. 1A in that the example structure 500 has a second filler material 512 that partially covers the first filler material 510. In one or more implementations, the second filler material 512 (e.g., having lower refractive index) partially covers portions of the first filler material 510 (e.g., having higher refractive index) to reduce Fresnel reflection loss. Fresnel loss is a fractional loss where a fraction of light passing through is instead reflected. The reflected light bounces around and does not contribute to the peak brightness, thus, a fractional loss. The amount of reflected light depends on the difference in reflective indices of the filler materials 510, 512, for example, a smaller difference in refractive indices may reduce loss.

In the present implementation, the second filler material 512 covers a majority of the surface area (e.g., a plane parallel to the X-Y plane) of the first filler material 510 except for peripheral portions of the first filler material 510 immediately proximate the bank 506. Therefore, no second filler material 512 (e.g., a lower refractive index layer) are disposed immediately over the bank 506 such that Fresnel loss due to light reflected from the bank 506 may be prevented.

The first emission peak 514 may be emitted through an interface 520 along the on-axis direction in a central region of the example structure 500. The second emission peak 516 may be emitted at an off-axis direction and reflected by the interface 520 at least once via total internal reflection 518 before reaching a sloped sidewall 507 of the bank 506 and being emitted through the interface 520 along the on-axis direction at the peripheral portions of first filler material 510 immediately proximate to the sloped sidewall 507. This leads to higher efficiency, increase in on-axis brightness, and reduction in off-axis colour shift at various angles.

In another implementation, the second filler material 512 may only cover a surface area substantially over a central portion of the first filler material 510. The physical arrangement(s) of the second filler material 512 with respect to the first filler material 510 is not limited to the example arrangements. The second filler material 512 may partially cover the first filler material 510 in another manner not described.

FIG. 6 is a schematic cross-sectional view of an example structure 600 of a light emitting structure in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure. The example structure 600 includes a glass substrate 602, a sub-pixel stack 604, a bank 606, a first filler material 610, a second filler material 612, and a glass cover 622. The example structure 600 may substantially correspond to the example structure 100 in FIG. 1A. Therefore, the details of the example structure 600 are omitted for brevity.

In one or more implementations, the example structure 600 differs from the example structure 100 in FIG. 1A since the example structure 600 has a second filler material 612 that partially covers the first filler material 610, the first filler material 610 and second filler material 612 both occupy an interior space 608, and a portion of an interface 620 between the first filler material 610 and the second filler material 612 may be at an angle, specifically interface angle θ_(I), with reference to a top surface of the sub-pixel stack 604. A correlation between a bank angle θ_(B) of a sloped sidewall 607, the interface angle θ_(I), and an off-axis second emission peak angle θ_(P) with respect to an on-axis first emission peak 614 can be represented by the equation:

θ_(B)=θ_(I)+(θ_(P)/2)  Equation (3).

In the example structure 100 in FIG. 1A, the interface angle θ_(I) is zero since the interface 120 between the first filler material 110 and second filler material 112 is parallel with respect to the top surface of the sub-pixel stack 104. Therefore, the Equation (3) may be reduced to θ_(B)=(θ_(P)/2). In other words, the bank angle θ_(B) in the example structure 100 is twice the second emission peak angle θ_(P) in the example structure 100.

In one or more implementations, a portion of the interface 620 between the first filler material 610 and the second filler material 612 immediately proximate the sloped sidewall 607 is angled upwards towards the bank 606. In other words, a portion of the interface 620 immediately proximate to the sloped sidewall 607 is at an angle, specifically the interface angle θ_(I), with respect to a top surface of the sub-pixel stack 604 as shown in FIG. 6.

The interface 620 with the interface angle θ_(I) has a sloped surface area (e.g., a plane between the Y-Z plane and the X-Y plane). The sloped surface area of the interface 620 is where the last reflection via total internal reflection 618 of second emission peak 616 occurs before reaching the sloped sidewall 607 of the bank 606. The extent of the sloped surface area of the interface 620 depends on a distance D_(BS) from a top surface of the bank 606 to the onset of the sloped surface area of the second filler material 612. In one preferred implementation, with reference to FIG. 6, a distance D_(BS) correlates to a total thickness T_(AF) and the bank angle θ_(B). The total thickness T_(AF) is a sum of a thickness of the first filler material 610 (e.g., the thinnest part of the first filler material 610) and a thickness T_(2f) of the second filler material 612 near the centre of the first and second filler materials 610, 612. Moreover, a distance D_(F) correlates to the thickness T_(2f) and the interface angle θ_(I) or to the total thickness T_(AF), the thickness T_(2f) of the second filler material 612, the off-axis second emission peak angle θ_(P) with respect to the on-axis first emission peak 614, and the interface angle θ_(I) in the following equations:

D _(BS) =T _(AF)/tan(θ_(B))  Equation (4)

D _(F) =T _(2f)/tan(θ_(I))=(T _(AF) −T _(2f))*tan(θ_(P)+2θ_(I))  Equation (5).

By adjusting the various parameters above, the preferred bank angle θ_(B) may be obtained.

In one or more implementations, the bank angle θ_(B) may be narrow. In one preferred implementation, the bank angle θ_(B) is approximately 20-40° such that the bank 606 of a pixel may have a larger bank surface area (e.g., a plane of the sloped sidewall 607 between the Y-Z plane and the X-Y plane in FIG. 6) than another bank surface area with a wider bank angle. For emissive displays such as QLEDs, there is a limit to the surface brightness that can be achieved since higher surface brightness can lead to lower product life. Therefore, a narrow bank angle and high bank surface area can reduce the overall brightness while improving on-axis brightness.

In one or more implementations, after the off-axis second emission peak 616 totally and internally reflects (618) at least once against the portion of the interface 620 immediately proximate the sloped sidewall 607, the angle of the second emission peak 616 changes on its last totally internal reflection 618 resulting in the second emission peak 616 being emitted along the on-axis direction. A narrower bank angle and larger projected bank surface area provide preferred collimated performances.

In one or more implementations of the present disclosure, the top emitting structure having an ITO top transparent electrode provides a higher collimation ratio, e.g., 2.26, compared to the collimation ratio of 1, for a Lambertian source. A standard LCD backlight with brightness enhancement films has a collimation ratio of about 3 to 3.5, an OLED/QLED with a typical interior space structure (e.g., cavity structure) and a metal top electrode has a collimation ratio of about 2, and an OLED/QLED with a transparent ITO top electrode (providing better colour shift and efficiency than the cavity structure) has a collimation ratio of about 1.03.

FIG. 7A is a schematic cross-sectional view of another example light emitting structure 700A in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure. The example structure 700A includes a glass substrate 702, a sub-pixel stack 704, a bank 706 having a sloped sidewall 707, a cavity 708, a first filler material 710, a second filler material 712, an interface 720 between the first filler material 710 and the second filler material 712, and a glass cover 722. The example structure 700A may substantially correspond to the example structure 100 described in FIG. 1A. Therefore, the details of the example structure 700A are omitted for brevity.

In one or more implementations, the sub-pixel stack 704 of the example structure 700A may include an emissive area 724A (e.g., a top surface area of the sub-pixel stack 704 in FIG. 7A) from which on-axis first emission peaks and off-axis second emission peaks may emit. The size of an emission area may be configured such that at least one of the second emission peaks is reflected by an interface not more than once before reaching a sloped sidewall of a bank. In the example structure 700A, the emission area 724A may emit an on-axis first emission peak 714 a (e.g., a dotted-line arrow) and an off-axis second emission peak 716 (e.g., solid arrows 718 a and 716), and the second emission peak 716 may be totally reflected internally not more than once against the interface 720 via total internal reflection 718 a before being reflected off the sloped sidewall 707 at an angle that is normal to the top surface of the sub-pixel stack 704. For second emission peaks to reflect not more than once against the interface 720, the size of the emission area 724A may be determined by a minimum sub-pixel emissive width, W, of the emissive area 724A. The minimum width, W, correlates to a thickness T_(1f) of the first filler material 710 and an angle θ_(P) between the on-axis direction of the first emission peak 714 a and the off-axis direction of the second emission peak 716 from the emissive area 724A (e.g., direction along the arrow indicated by 718 a) in the following equation:

W=4*T _(1f)*tan(θ_(P))  Equation (6).

In other implementations, the emission area 724A may emit another on-axis first emission peak 714 b and an off-axis second emission peak 716 (e.g., propagating along the arrows 718 b, 718 a, and 716). The second emission peak 716 may be totally reflected internally against the interface 720 via total internal reflection (e.g., 718 b and 718 a) before being reflected off the sloped sidewall 707 at an angle that is normal to the top surface of the sub-pixel stack 704.

FIG. 7B is a schematic cross-sectional view of another example light emitting structure in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure. The example structure 700B may substantially correspond to the example structure 700A described in FIG. 7A. Therefore, the details of the example structure 700A are omitted for brevity.

In one or more implementations with reference to the example structure 700B in FIG. 7B, an emission area 724B of a sub-pixel stack 704 may emit an on-axis first emission peak 714 c (e.g., a solid arrow) and an off-axis second emission peak 716 c (e.g., solid arrows 718 c and 716 c). The second emission peak 716 c may be totally reflected internally not more than once against the interface 720 via total internal reflection (e.g., solid arrow 718 c) before being reflected off the sloped sidewall 707 at an angle that is normal to the top surface of the sub-pixel stack 704.

In other implementations, the emission area 724B may emit another on-axis first emission peak 714 d and an off-axis second emission peak 716 d (e.g., dotted line arrows 718 d and 716 d). The second emission peak 716 d is also totally reflected internally not more than once against the interface 720 via total internal reflection (e.g., dotted line arrow 718 d) before being reflected off the sloped sidewall 707 at an angle that is normal to the top surface of the sub-pixel stack 704.

As shown in FIG. 7B, not only light emission from the centre of the sub-pixel in at least one direction from the off-axis peak does not impact the cavity before reaching the bank, but also the off-axis emission impacts not more than once on the cavity for any emission anywhere on the sub-pixel.

FIG. 8A is a schematic perspective view of an example light emitting structure 800 in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure. FIG. 8B is a schematic top view of the light emitting structure 800 of FIG. 8A.

In one or more implementations of the present application, the light emitting structure 800 may include a plurality of sub-pixel stacks arranged in a two-dimensional (2-D) array (e.g., a rectangular array). As illustrated in FIGS. 8A and 8B, the light emitting structure 800 includes three sets of four adjacently arranged sub-pixel stacks each set emitting a different colour (e.g., four red sub-pixel stacks on the left, four green sub-pixel stacks in the middle, and four blue sub-pixel stacks on the right). Each of the three sets of sub-pixel stacks emitting the same colour may constitute one active area, and may be controlled by the same control signal such that all sub-pixel stacks emitting the same colour function as one pixel with equivalent structures and uniform emissions.

As shown in FIGS. 8A and 8B, each sub-pixel stack 804 may include an emissive area 824 and a bank 806 surrounding the sub-pixel stack. Each sub-pixel stack 804 and corresponding bank 806 may also include substantially the same components (e.g., glass substrate, first filler material, second filler material, etc., not explicitly shown) as those shown and described with reference to the example structure 100 in FIG. 1A. Therefore, the details of the light emitting structure 800 are omitted for brevity.

In one or more implementations, two or more sub-pixel stacks emitting the same colour that are arranged adjacent to one another and are controlled by the same control signal such that the two sub-pixel stacks together act as one colour pixel with equivalent structures and uniform emissions. For example, a sub-pixel stack emitting one colour (e.g., a red sub-pixel stack 804R₁ on the upper left corner in FIG. 8B) may be arranged adjacent to another sub-pixel stack emitting the same colour (e.g., another red sub-pixel stack 804R₂ immediately to the right of the red sub-pixel stack 804R₁ in FIG. 8B) and the two sub-pixel stacks are controlled by the same control signal. In another implementation, the light emitting structure 800 may include at least four sub-pixel stacks emitting the same colour that are arranged adjacent to one another in a rectangular array (e.g., red sub-pixel stacks 804R₁, 804R₂, 804R₃, and 804R₄ in FIG. 8B) and are controlled by the same control signal.

In the present implementation, the light emitting structure 800 may include three sets of four adjacently arranged sub-pixel stacks emitting three different colours (e.g., four sub-pixel stacks R′ including four red emissive areas 824 on the left, four sub-pixel stacks G′ including four green emissive areas 824 in the middle, and four sub-pixel stacks B′ including four blue emissive areas 824 on the right in FIG. 8B). In the present implementation, each of the three sets of four adjacently arranged sub-pixel stacks has a rectangular array. However, the shape of the array is not limited to the example provided herein. For example, each set of four adjacently arranged sub-pixel stacks in the light emitting structure 800 may have a square, triangular, or hexagonal array. In the present implementation, each emissive area 824 may have a rectangular shape in FIG. 8B. However, the shape of each emissive area 824 is not limited to the example provided herein. In the present implementation, the minimum pixel emissive width W of each rectangular emissive area 824 is a distance in the x-direction.

FIG. 9A is a schematic top view of an example light emitting structure 900A in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure. As shown in FIG. 9A, the light emitting structure 900A may include a plurality of sub-pixel stacks each having an emissive area 924 and a bank 906. The light emitting structure 900A may include substantially the same components (e.g., glass substrate, first filler material, second filler material, etc., not shown) as the light emitting structure 800 described in FIGS. 8A and 8B. Therefore, the details of the light emitting structure 900A are omitted for brevity. The light emitting structure 900A differs from the light emitting structure 800 in that each sub-pixel stack and the corresponding emissive area 924 in the light emitting structure 900A may have an elongated rectangular shape. It should be noted that the shape of each emissive area 924 is not limited to the example provided herein. In the present implementation, the minimum pixel emissive width, W, of each elongated rectangular emissive area 924 is a distance in the x-direction.

In some implementations (e.g., in FIGS. 8A, 8B, and 9A), the banks are in contact with one another at the top edge. In some implementations, each two adjacent banks may be separated by a gap.

FIG. 9B is a schematic cross-sectional view of the example light emitting structure 900A of FIG. 9A along line A-A′ in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure. As shown in FIG. 9B, the light emitting structure 900B may include a glass substrate 902, two sub-pixel stacks 904R, banks 906, a first filler material 910, a second filler material 912, an interface 920 between the first filler material 910 and the second filler material 912, and a glass cover 922. Each of the two sub-pixel structures in the light emitting structure 900B may substantially correspond to the sub-pixel structure shown in the light emitting structure 100 in FIG. 1A. Thus, the details of the sub-pixel structure are omitted for brevity.

In one or more implementations, each sub-pixel stack 904R of the example structure 900B may include an emissive area 924 (e.g., a top surface area of the sub-pixel stack 904R in FIG. 9B) from which on-axis first emission peaks and off-axis second emission peaks may emit. The size of the emission area 924 may be configured such that at least one of the second emission peaks is reflected by an interface not more than once before reaching a sloped sidewall of a bank. In the example structure 900B, the emission area 924 may emit an on-axis first emission peak 914 and an off-axis second emission peak 916, where the second emission peak 916 may be totally reflected internally not more than once against the interface 920 via total internal reflection 918 before being reflected off the sloped sidewall 907 at an angle that is normal to the top surface of the sub-pixel stack 904. For the second emission peaks to reflect not more than once against the interface 920, the size of the emission area 924 may be determined by a minimum sub-pixel emissive width, W, of the emissive area 924, where W is determined based on Equation (6) above.

In the present implementation, the angular distribution and colour shift in the x-direction may be more important than the y-direction. Thus, the second emission peaks are reflected not more than once against the interface 920 in the x-direction, which is achieved by configuring the minimum sub-pixel emissive width, W, in the x-direction. In the present implementation, the two sub-pixel structures in the light emitting structure 900B are controlled by the same control signal 940 to emit the same colour. In the present implementation, the resolution in the x-direction (for three colours, having two sub-pixels per colour) may reduce the resolution (white pixels) to a level that is more achievable.

It should be noted that the banks in FIG. 9A are shown to be touching each other at the top edge. In some implementations, there may be a gap between the tops of banks, and the active area and bank height may be smaller than shown here. The overall patterns and shapes should be the same and is assumed for all shapes and patterns described in the present disclosure. It is also possible that all the layers from the cavity are continuous over the bank separating two non-independent sub-pixels.

FIG. 10 is a schematic top view of an example light emitting structure 1000 in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure. In the present implementation, the light emitting structure 1000 may include three sets of four adjacently arranged sub-pixel stacks each set emitting a different colour (e.g., four red sub-pixel stacks R′ on the left, four green sub-pixel stacks G′ in the middle, and four blue sub-pixel stacks B′ on the right). In the present implementation, each of the three sets of four adjacently arranged sub-pixel stacks has a circular shape, and is arranged in a closely-packed 2-D array. Each set of the four adjacently arranged sub-pixel stacks may be controlled by the same control signal such that the four sub-pixel stacks together act as one pixel with equivalent structures and uniform emissions. It should be noted that the shape of the array is not limited to the examples provided herein. For example, each of the sub-pixel stacks in the example structure 1000 may have a square, triangular, or hexagonal shape. In the present implementation, each sub-pixel stack, each corresponding emissive area 1024, and each corresponding bank 1006 may have a circular shape. However, the shape is not limited to the examples provided herein. In the present disclosure, the closely-packed-circular array with the circular sub-pixel stacks, emissive areas, and banks may be a preferred arrangement to further reduce visibility of the pixel array for smartphone and VR applications. In the present implementation, the minimum pixel emissive width W of each emissive area 1024 is a diameter of the circular emissive area.

FIG. 11 is a schematic top view of an example light emitting structure 1100 in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure. In the present implementation, the light emitting structure 1100 may include three sets of two adjacently arranged sub-pixel stacks each set emitting a different colour (e.g., two red sub-pixel stacks R′ on the left, two green sub-pixel stacks G′ in the middle, and two blue sub-pixel stacks B′ on the right). In the present implementation, each of the three sets of two adjacently arranged sub-pixel stacks has an elliptical shape and is arranged in a 2-D array. Each set of the two adjacently arranged sub-pixel stacks may be controlled by the same control signal such that the two sub-pixel stacks together act as one pixel with equivalent structures and uniform emissions. It should be noted that the shape of the array is not limited to the example provided herein. For example, each of the sub-pixel stacks in the example structure 1100 may have a square, triangular, or hexagonal shape. In the present implementation, each sub-pixel stack, each corresponding emissive area 1124, and each corresponding bank 1106 may have an elliptical shape. However, the shape is not limited to the examples provided herein.

With reference to FIG. 9A, a rectangular sub-pixel of the light emitting structure 900A is an elongated version of a rectangular pixel of light emitting structure 800B in FIG. 8B. Similarly, an elliptical sub-pixel in FIG. 11 is an elongated version of a circular sub-pixel in FIG. 10. With the elliptical sub-pixels, collimation is possible in one direction while being broad in the another direction, which could be applicable in television display viewing where angular breath in one axis (e.g., x-axis) is required, but not in the other direction (e.g., y-axis). The light in the other direction can be collimated to a greater extent to increase the brightness of the television display. The horizontal axis of the display (e.g., broad) would then be parallel to the long axis (e.g., x-axis) of the elliptical sub-pixels as shown in FIG. 11. In FIG. 11, colour stripes are vertical, aligned along the short axis of the elliptical sub-pixels. In contrast, it may be possible to have the colour stripes aligned along the long axes of the elliptical sub-pixels, which may improve the overall resolution for a red, green, and blue (RGB) display. In the present implementation, the minimum pixel emissive width, W, of each elliptical emissive area 1124 is the major axis of the elliptical emissive area 1124 in the x-direction.

FIG. 12 is a schematic top view of an example light emitting structure 1200 in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure. In the present implementation, the light emitting structure 1200 may include three sets of sub-pixel stacks each set emitting a different colour. In the present implementation, the three sets of sub-pixel stacks may include sub-pixel stacks of different quantity and sizes. For example, as shown in the example structure 1200, a first array 1250R may include six red sub-pixel stacks R′ having small-size circular emissive areas 1224R having a minimum width (W_(R)) and banks 1206R. The light emitting structure 1200 may include a second array 1250G having four green sub-pixel stacks G′ with medium-size circular emissive areas 1224G having a minimum width (W_(G)) and banks 1206G. The light emitting structure 1200 may include a third array 1250B having three blue sub-pixel stacks B′ with large-size circular emissive areas 1224B having a minimum width (WB) and banks 1206B.

In the present implementation, the circular emissive areas 1224R, 1224G, and 1224B have different diameters. In one implementation, it is also possible for only one set of sub-pixels to meet the size requirements to ensure that the off-axis emissions from the emissive area are reflected upon the interface not more than once before reaching the sloped sidewall of the bank. According to implementations of the present disclosure, absorption in emission cavities may be significantly greater for blue colour emissions than for green or red colour emissions. Hence, it is possible for the blue sub-pixels to meet the size requirements in a display and the green and red not to. In some implementations of the present disclosure, the size of the emissive area can be smaller as the cavity absorption increases and the number of sub-pixels can be uneven among different pixel colours. Also, it should be noted that the shapes and sizes of the sub-pixel stacks are not limited to the examples provided herein.

FIG. 13 is a schematic top view of an example light emitting structure 1300 in accordance with an example implementation of the present disclosure. In the present implementation, the example structure 1300 may include at least four sets of two adjacently arranged sub-pixel stacks, three of the four sets of two adjacently arranged sub-pixel stacks each emitting a different colour. In the present implementation, the four sets of two adjacently arranged sub-pixel stacks may together be arranged in a diamond interlaced array. For example, two red sub-pixel stacks R (each having an emissive area 1324R and a bank 1306R), two green triangular sub-pixel stacks G (each having an emissive area 1324G and a bank 1306G), two blue triangular sub-pixel stacks B′ (each having an emissive area 1324B′ and a bank 1306B′), and another two blue triangular sub-pixel stacks B″ (each having an emissive area 1324B″ and a bank 1306B″), where the four sets of two adjacently arranged sub-pixel stacks are be arranged together in a diamond interlaced array. However, it should be noted that the shapes and sizes of the sub-pixel stacks are not limited to the examples provided herein. In one or more implementations, each set of the two adjacently arranged sub-pixel stacks is controlled by the same control signal. In the present implementation, the minimum pixel emissive width, W, of each of the triangular emissive area 1324R, 1324B′, 1324B″, and 1324G are the same.

Regarding FIGS. 8A, 8B, 9A, 9B, 10, 11, 12, and 13, it should be noted that the emissive areas and bank heights may be smaller than illustrated in the drawings. The overall patterns (e.g., array) and shapes of the emissive areas and banks should be substantially the same. Moreover, in one or more implementations, all layers above the sub-pixel stack are continuously arranged over the bank(s) and separating two sub-pixels under the same control signal. In some implementations, it may be possible for only one set of sub-pixel stacks to meet the size (e.g., minimum pixel emissive width) requirements above. According to implementations of the present disclosure, absorption in the cavity structure (e.g., first filler material) may be significantly greater for blue colour emitting sub-pixel stacks than for the green or red colour emitting sub-pixel stacks. Hence, it is possible for the blue sub-pixel stacks to meet the size requirements in a display while the green and red sub-pixel stacks may not. In some implementations of the present disclosure, the size of the sub-pixel stacks may be smaller as the cavity absorption increases. In some other implementations, the number of sub-pixel stacks may be uneven between sub-pixel stacks of different colours. In one or more implementations as shown in FIGS. 8A, 8B, 9A, 9B, 10, 11, 12, and 13, it should be noted that the minimum pixel emissive width is configured such that the off-axis emissions from the emissive area are reflected upon the interface not more than once before reaching the sloped sidewall of the bank.

From the present disclosure, it can be seen that various techniques may be used for implementing the concepts described in the present disclosure without departing from the scope of those concepts. While the concepts have been described with specific reference to certain implementations, a person of ordinary skill in the art may recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the scope of those concepts.

As such, the described implementations are to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive. It should also be understood that the present disclosure is not limited to the particular implementations described but rather many rearrangements, modifications, and substitutions are possible without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A light emitting structure comprising: a substrate; a sub-pixel stack over the substrate; a bank surrounding the sub-pixel stack on the substrate and forming a cavity above the sub-pixel stack; a first filler material in the cavity; and a second filler material over the first filler material; wherein the sub-pixel stack emits a first emission peak along an on-axis direction substantially normal to a top surface of the sub-pixel stack, and a second emission peak along an off-axis direction at an angle to the on-axis direction; wherein the first emission peak emits through an interface between the first filler material and the second filler material substantially without reflection; wherein the second emission peak from the sub-pixel stack is totally reflected by the interface onto a sloped sidewall of the bank, and the second emission peak reflected from the sloped sidewall of the bank emits along the on-axis direction through the interface substantially without reflection; and wherein an emissive area of the sub-pixel stack is configured such that the second emission peak is reflected by the interface not more than once before reaching the sloped sidewall of the bank.
 2. The light emitting structure of claim 1, wherein a minimum width of the emissive area of the sub-pixel stack is configured based on a thickness of the first filler material, and the angle between the on-axis direction of the first emission peak and the off-axis direction of the second emission peak.
 3. The light emitting structure of claim 1, wherein: the first emission peak is emitted through the interface along the on-axis direction in a central region of the light emitting structure; the second emission peak reflected by the sloped sidewall of the bank is emitted through the interface along the on-axis direction in a peripheral region of the light emitting structure; and on-axis brightness is increased and off-axis colour shift having an angle is reduced.
 4. The light emitting structure of claim 1, wherein: the first emission peak is emitted through the interface along the on-axis direction in a peripheral region of the light emitting structure adjacent to a bottom edge of the bank; the second emission peak reflected by the sloped sidewall of the bank is emitted through the interface along the on-axis direction in another peripheral region of the light emitting structure opposite of the peripheral region; and on-axis brightness is increased and off-axis colour shift having an angle is reduced.
 5. The light emitting structure of claim 1, further comprising: another sub-pixel stack arranged immediately adjacent to the sub-pixel stack; wherein the another sub-pixel stack emits the first emission peak and the second emission peak, and has an emissive area substantially equal to the emission area of the sub-pixel stack.
 6. The light emitting structure of claim 5, wherein the sub-pixel stack and the another sub-pixel stack are controlled to a same control signal.
 7. The light emitting structure of claim 1, wherein the second filler material has a second refractive index substantially equal to or lower than a first refractive index of the first filler material.
 8. The light emitting structure of claim 1, wherein the emissive area has one of the following shapes: a rectangular shape; a square shape an elliptical shape; a circular shape; and a triangular shape.
 9. The light emitting structure of claim 1, wherein an angle between the sloped sidewall of the bank and the top surface of the sub-pixel stack is one-half the angle between the on-axis direction of the first emission peak and the off-axis direction of the second emission peak.
 10. The light emitting structure of claim 1, wherein the sub-pixel stack comprises: an emissive layer between a first transport layer and a second transport layer; a first electrode layer coupled to the first transport layer; and a second electrode layer coupled to the second transport layer.
 11. The light emitting structure of claim 10, wherein: the emissive layer includes a quantum dot emission material; the first transport layer includes a hole transport layer; the second transport layer includes an electron transport layer; the first electrode layer is an anode layer including a metallic reflector for reflecting the light emitted from the emissive layer; and the second electrode layer is a cathode layer including a non-metallic and substantially transparent material.
 12. The light emitting structure of claim 10, wherein: the emissive layer includes quantum dot emission material; the first transport layer includes an electron transport layer; the second transport layer includes a hole transport layer; the first electrode layer is a cathode layer having a metallic reflector for reflecting the light emitted from the emissive layer; and the second electrode layer is an anode layer having a non-metallic and substantially transparent material.
 13. A display device comprising the light emitting structure of claim
 1. 14. A light emitting structure comprising: a substrate; a plurality of sub-pixel structures over the substrate, each of the plurality of sub-pixel structures having a same emissive area; wherein at least one of the plurality of sub-pixel structures includes: a sub-pixel stack over the substrate; a bank surrounding the sub-pixel stack on the substrate and forming a cavity above the sub-pixel stack; a first filler material in the cavity; and a second filler material over the first filler material, the second filler material having a second refractive index substantially equal to or lower than a first refractive index of the first filler material; wherein the sub-pixel stack emits a first emission peak along an on-axis direction substantially normal to a top surface of the sub-pixel stack, and a second emission peak along an off-axis direction at an angle to the on-axis direction; wherein the first emission peak emits through an interface between the first filler material and the second filler material substantially without reflection; wherein the second emission peak from the sub-pixel stack is totally reflected by the interface onto a sloped sidewall of the bank, and the second emission peak reflected from the sloped sidewall of the bank emits along the on-axis direction through the interface substantially without reflection; and wherein the second emission peak is reflected by the interface not more than once before reaching the sloped sidewall of the bank.
 15. The light emitting structure of claim 14, wherein a minimum width of the emissive area is configured based on a thickness of the first filler material, and the angle between the on-axis direction of the first emission peak and the off-axis direction of the second emission peak.
 16. The light emitting structure of claim 14, wherein an angle between the sloped sidewall of the bank and the top surface of the sub-pixel stack is one-half the angle between the on-axis direction of the first emission peak and the off-axis direction of the second emission peak.
 17. The light emitting structure of claim 14, wherein the emissive areas of the plurality of sub-pixel structures are substantially the same, and have one of the following shapes: a rectangular shape; a square shape an elliptical shape; a circular shape; and a triangular shape.
 18. The light emitting structure of claim 14, wherein the sub-pixel stack comprises: an emissive layer between a first transport layer and a second transport layer; a first electrode layer coupled to the first transport layer; and a second electrode layer coupled to the second transport layer.
 19. The light emitting structure of claim 18, wherein: the emissive layer includes quantum dot emission material; the first transport layer includes a hole transport layer; the second transport layer includes an electron transport layer; the first electrode layer is an anode layer including a metallic reflector for reflecting the light emitted from the emissive layer; and the second electrode layer is a cathode layer including a non-metallic and substantially transparent material.
 20. The light emitting structure of claim 18, wherein: the emissive layer includes quantum dot emission material; the first transport layer includes an electron transport layer; the second transport layer includes a hole transport layer; the first electrode layer is a cathode layer having a metallic reflector for reflecting the light emitted from the emissive layer; and the second electrode layer is an anode layer having a non-metallic and substantially transparent material. 